The Democratic operative that smashed 11 windows of the Dem HQ in Denver, who was paid by the SEIU-related front group CCC, according to Colorado blogger El Presidente. Of course, this was widely reported as being the work of townhall protesters. The truth was revealed much later to again....the sound of crickets.
DON'T PLAY INTO THEIR HANDS
The Marxists are desperate to find violence on the right. When they don't, they create it.
They have a looooong history of doing just that.
Saul Alinsky wrote, "The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means...."
The progressive movement has long been known for its intolerance of opposing philosophies and its propensity for violence to attain its goals. As Noel Sheppard notes, at the 2008 Republican Convention leftist demonstrators hospitalized conventioneers with bricks thrown through bus windows and sandbags dropped from overpasses onto passing cars. The progressive media looked the other way.
Following the passage of ObamaCare, much media frenzy has surrounded incidents where a coffin was put on congressman Carnahan's front lawn (didn't happen) and a brick was thrown through congresswoman Slaughter's Niagara Falls office window. Of course, the last time someone smashed Democratic Party office windows, a Democrat was found responsible.
Check this list of all the faked violent hate crimes from the past few years.
The Tea Party demonstrations in DC the previous weekend were noted by the progressive media only for an "alleged" incident (although some reports did not use the word "alleged") of a black congressman being "spit on", and another of someone shouting the "n-word".The question I have is, why did these congresspeople, including Emmanuel Cleaver (the alleged "spitee", who actually walked too close to a protester shouting "kill the bill" and got sprayed), Barney Frank, and Nancy Pelosi deliberately march into the demonstration and confront the Tea Partiers? After all, wasn't it Nancy herself who said she was "frightened" by these supposedly violent people? Is it possible that they wanted to provoke a reaction from the crowd to be used by the media to demonize the Tea Party movement (i.e., "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it")? Is it also possible that when there was nothing sufficiently provoked by the lawmakers' confrontation, they decided to fabricate it? I believe their previous record of untruthfulness supports this hypothesis.Andrew Breitbart raised the stakes by offering a reward of $10,000 to anyone who could prove a Tea Partier shouted the "n-word". Despite the dozens of video cameras on the scene, no one has yet claimed the prize. Next, the Associated Press attacked Breitbart in a "news" story, saying that he has no proof that the incident didn't happen. In response, Breitbart has now raised the reward to $100,000.
What do you suppose will be the next move by the Alinsky left? There are a large number of Tea Party demonstrations scheduled around the country in April. I don't believe there is any doubt that the left will step up their attempts to provoke a Tea Party incident that they can capture on video. Even more likely, they will infiltrate demonstrations and create ugly incidents masquerading as Tea Party participants. The progressive media, doing their part for the cause, will appear at more of these events for the sole purpose of broadcasting the "proof" of Tea Party racism and/or violence.
He offers two bits of advice that I believe to be very important for the protests coming up:
Don't be goaded into saying or doing anything ugly or stupid. Keep a lid on your emotions. Don't be like they are. If we do that, what's the point?
Take video cameras and when you see someone posing as a protester being an ass, film it. When you see attacks, film them.
They can manufacture all they want, but with technology their BS will evaporate. USE IT.
And remember to rise above and be the fine people that we are.