Friday, April 30, 2010


Shut up, ya lil' whippersnappers! It's NOT because I'm getting old! MAN I hate you! :)

It's because I don't want to give one DIME to wack-jobs that are hell bent on a Marxist revolution where everyone (except them) will have to sacrifice all their power and money to the State that knows better than you do, what you deserve and need.

IN ONE FREAKIN' DAY, I find this crap (mostly via Big Hollywood- check them out!):

Cameron Mitchel:
“It’s China, it’s India Anywhere the middle-class is exploding, everyone’s sucking up more power. Population’s continuing to grow, you know we’re going to have to do something about it.”
Bitches need to be on their save the earth from the laughing stock of the disproved, faked evidence of man-made glo-bull warming!....well, 'cept for him, of course. He NEEDS his jets and money. But those damn Indians- They are SO SELFISH to want to eat more than a half cup of rice with rat poop in it every day! They hate the earth. Racists.

And Sting formerly of the (cough, cough) "punk" group The Police. They were posers then, they're even phonier now:

“Well, you can see the enthusiasm out there. And people are here to really tell big government that we want big government to make big decisions about the most important problems we face. And also to pressure our corporations to behave properly, as consumers, but we’re here to — we’re asking for big government, basically.”

Because slavery is AWESOME! DUDE! Please, PLEASE pimp me out!

And Harrison Ford:

Note how the bulk of the information he was presenting (he IS an actor, after all) was his fragile, carefully worded, deep, deep, thoughtful benevolence and dignity. I bow before your wagu steak, oh golden one!

Now, I know art is art and politics is politics. But these ass-hats are using the money YOU freely give them, to add to the money STOLEN from you by force, to support totalitarian marxist bullshit and make this earth a living hell.

I have Thin Man movies on dvd and bluegrass. I'm not hurtin by turning my back on these evil clowns. Ok, well, maybe I'm hurtin for something to talk about with people that have nothing to talk about, 'cept hot new movies and celebrities. Anything else might crack the "chillin" bubble that must be maintained at all costs, even while they are being used as tools in the service of their own destruction. I can understand. I hate being upset about things too. Unless it has to do with my own survival. But I'm just an irritating dick. Whadda I know?

K. Ow. I am suffering. Whatevah.

Boycott Hollywood.

I been feelin' THIS lately, fer instance (warning: they were from the south, and so necessarily racist, as slavery is the ONLY thing that was ever part of their culture. No humanity, no goodness at all, in any way, anywhere, just pure evil all the time.)


Roger L. Simon at Pajamas Media:

The real reason liberals accuse Tea Partiers of racism is that contemporary American-style liberalism is in rigor mortis. Liberals have nothing else to say or do. Accusations of racism are their last resort....

Socialism has always failed and its failing now in Greece and the rest of Europe

Liberals, leftists or progressives — whatever they choose to call themselves — have a great deal of trouble accepting this. To do so they would have to question a host of positions they have not examined for years, if ever, not to mention have to engage in discussions that could threaten their livelihood and jeopardize their personal and family associations.

Oh you gotta WITNESS!!!

Thus the traditional wish to kill the messenger who brings the bad news: the Tea Partiers. And the easiest way to kill them — the most obvious and hoariest of methods – is to accuse them of racism. Never mind that there is no evidence — or what little evidence proffered has been shown to be manufactured prevarication — liberals must continue the racism meme at all costs. There is no other. To engage the Tea Party Movement in a battle of ideas would be suicidal for them, because the basic economic tenet of American liberalism — an increase in government spending and consequent increased national debt is good for society — seems nonsensical to the vast majority of our citizens at this point in history. And for good reason.

Times may get a whole lot worse, it maybe even likely. But goodness and truth ALWAYS win in the end, and people are waking up already. Despite their sense of over-whelming superiority and disdain for what they see as the stupid public, most people have sense enough to see what is in front of their faces....when the information becomes accessible.

The more they scream "racist" the weaker they show themselves to be.


I had a conversation with a friend that is a conservative, but can't yet admit it. Boy, I understand the dilema! Friends leave, you leave friends, you are called every name in the book by the media and the government in power now, suddenly you're not cool anymore and your world is turned upside down. Little scary. I know.

After agreeing on so much, she told me that she is a firm proponent of "choice" and sex ed in schools.

I'm cool with nuts and bolts sex ed to prevent tragedy in young people's lives through lack of their parents taking responsibility to teach them. To a point. But boundaries are an anathema to the left. Always gotta take that education to the point where they're giving etiquette lessons for leather bars. Sex ed in schools goes FAR beyond nuts and bolts- kids are being taught in some schools about fisting. It's something that Der Messiah's "safe schools czar" supported. Cracker, PLEASE.

Then I told her that I was pro-life because, CONDOMS ARE PLENTIFUL so no one has to get pregnant if they don't want to (yes, yes, there is a minority that become so through rape or incest. That doesn't change the fact the for the over-whelming majority it's a form of birth control).

So lets look at a pro-choice expert dedicated to educating the young:

Aimee Thorne-Thomsen of the Pro-Choice Public Education Project mused on KOS,

"Do we dare admit that increasing the number of abortions might be not only good for women's health, but also moral and just?"

You know, because having a kid may interfere with your "self actualization" and stifle the carefree life that you want. To be denied that is bad for a woman's health.

M'kay. Use a condom, and be enough of a strong, powerful woman to tell a man when he says, "it just doesn't feel quite as good wearing one," during your 15 minute tryst, to go to hell if he won't do that. YOU are going to deal with the consequences much more than he ever will.

But of course, if you don't give him 100% pleasure instead of 98% before he dumps you for something better, you don't care about his needs and don't really love him.

Did the REAL feminism that used to exist accomplish NOTHING?

Stand up and grow some ovaries.
Iran demonstrates "gender equality and the advancement of women"


That is, if you truly care.

The UN’s Economic and Social Council has just elected Iran to a seat on the UN’s women’s rights commission — formally known as the Commission on the Status of Women. This outfit describes itself on its web site as the UN’s “principal global policy making body” for “gender equality and advancement of women.” (via Pajamas Media)

In other, same day news from that great champion of women's rights, Iran:
Women with suntans are violating Islamic law and will be arrested in Iran, the capital city's police chief was reported by The Daily Telegraph as saying Wednesday. (via Fox)

Bitches are LUCKY they aren't getting burned with acid, stoned to death, beaten, mutilated and killed like they do for other crimes against....well....women, I guess, since Iran cares enough for their welfare to be appointed to speak for the women of the world.

You're not a misogynist, are you?


Really, HOW the HELL can there be any more debate on this?

It's like getting punched in the face and then stopping to wonder whether or not there is a fist involved.

There was Der Messiah's past. There was "I just want to spread the wealth around." There is all that he and his minions have rammed down our throats, whether we want it or not, to take money from un-born generations to create a total government and make us all dependents of it.

Now this:

No youtube back then but here is Karl Marx:

From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.

A seed was planted in me when I was arguing with someone, back in my bad ol days, about this oft repeated quote. They said to me, ok, WHO is to do that and WHO is qualified to make those decisions for the infinite variety of the human population, taking all of each person into account?

I had no answer, so per usual, I just screamed that they were a nazi, racist, fascist...whatever and stomped off, secure in my enlightened goodness and their total evil, patting myself on the back.

The One feels that HE is qualified to make those decisions. So did Lenin, Mao, etc. Funny thing was, though, THEY always had a ton of money while everyone else was eatin' grass soup.

Those who feel that they can decide who deserves what and how much they need, somehow ALWAYS feel that they, personally deserve more.

"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."
George Orwell (Animal Farm)
(image via Israel Matzov)


The deeply enlightened left wing philosophy, continually acted upon by the Obamunist in a nut shell.
The Obama administration is pressing Congress to provide an exemption from Iran sanctions to companies based in "cooperating countries," a move that likely would exempt Chinese and Russian concerns from penalties meant to discourage investment in Iran.

The Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act is in a House-Senate conference committee and is expected to reach President Obama’s desk by Memorial Day. (via Sweetness and Light)

Forgot one more piece of the philosophy of the smarter-than-you: up is down, right is left, yes is no and night is day. Oh, and tough sanctions are no sanctions at all.

Go ahead an nuke us, Ahmadinnerjacket. We suck anyhow.


Some people have red hair. Most don't. So that's not normal.

Who the hell collects stamps these days? Some do. That's not normal.

I don't drive and I use oil lamps to light my apt. at night. Most don't. That's not normal.

Most people were made by God to be attracted to the opposite sex. Some aren't. That's not normal.

Are all of these things NORMAL for the individual? Absolutely.

Are they NORMAL for society at large. Not at all.

But living in reality is now a hate crime. Look at what just happened in the mirror of our future, England:

The Conservatives today suspended a parliamentary candidate who said homosexuality was "not normal behaviour".

A Tory spokeswoman said the comments by Philip Lardner, the party’s candidate for North Ayrshire and Arran, were "deeply offensive and unacceptable".

They acted after comments posted by Lardner on his website (pdf) were brought to their attention. Under the heading ‘What I believe in’, Lardner said: "Homosexuality is not ‘normal behaviour.’" (Guardian)

Garsh. I am deeply offended too- the fact that some have the GALL to point out that most people were made by God to be attracted to the opposite sex, instead of the way that He made me, offends my burning need, as an insane narcissist, to insist that we all pretend reality is otherwise.

When people tell me that the world is not a mirror of my own, individual self, yes, I am deeply offended!


I know it's old, but this image of truly, heart-felt pain at the oppression of others somehow fits (f-bomb warning). It's not normal.

Thursday, April 29, 2010


A white supremacist.
A (NY) state senator with a history of anger management issues says his race-based rant was part of his fight against the "evil of white supremacy." ...

"These long-term, white supremacist, you know, Republican senators," he said.


Funny. A cursory look at the Democratic party would identify IT as, in the long term, for most of it's history, as "white supremacist," while the republican party fought against slavery and for civil rights.

Of course, logic may come hard for a man that is so un-hinged:

There have been other temper tantrums involving the senator. Last year he was accused of felony assault after doing $1,000 in damage to the car of New York Post photographer William Lopez and smashing his camera after he snapped Parker's picture.

Two years ago, an aide filed charges against Parker, claiming he pushed her during an argument and smashed her glasses. In 2005, Parker was accused of punching a traffic agent in the face. The charges were dropped after parker agreed to take anger management classes. (WCBS)

But it's the Tea Party that's violent.

Part of the angry mob, bent on destruction!


It was only a matter of time.

From Gateway Pundit:
The SWAT Team was called in today at the Quincy Tea Party Rally. Obama was speaking at the Oakley-Lindsey/Quincy Community Center this afternoon.

It's only the left, as evidenced by their many protests involving arson, vandalism and most recently violent assault ( the black man called nigger and beaten at a tea party by SEIU thugs, the tea party patriot having their finger bitten off ), that believes violence is just fine to enforce their kind, caring world view. Those do-gooders Mao, Pol Pot and Stalin were forced to commit mass murder to make a better world as well. And then there's Bill Ayers', (Obama's good buddy) group, the Weather Underground, that mused that perhaps 25 million "un-re-educatable" Americans would have to be killed when they came to power.

The tea party patriots, instead, reject violence and work within the system that we still have left.

I spent many years going to left wing protests and the contrast is stunning. Tea partiers are passionate, yes, but I have never seen a more kind and polite group of people. The infiltrators at our last tea party were almost universally, politely ignored and not engaged.

Given all that, I think it's understandable that such narcissistic people as our current leader would assume everyone else feels as he does, as he taught from Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" that any means justifies the ends.

Gateway Pundit has the whole story, with vid and photo evidence.

What was the violent insurrection that called for riot police and roof top snipers?

We did everything the local police asked. We moved where they directed us. We moved when they asked us to. We double-checked that we were in an acceptable place on the street. We did not disobey the police and stand and sing God Bless America as some kind of protest. We stood on the corner and sang because we were told it was OK to stand on the corner and sing. (The report in the local paper was) a complete whitewash for the Obama Administration’s overreaction to old ladies with American flags.
Intimidating little old ladies. Wonder why The One is called a bully?

More than ever we need to heed the words and methods of Martin Luther King.

Got a comment today that tells me that because I posted a criticism of a Marxist's piece of "literature" involving the rape of a 13 yo, I am denying my own urges. In addition, I am a white supremacist that follows the "Elders of Zion".

They forgot to mention that I eat children for breakfast too.

Of course the larger point of the post, of which the literature in question was but a footnote was ignored.

Troll access? Denied.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010


America is evil.

It's our country, not yours.

You're all racist.


President Moonbat's friends and allies.

via Right Wing News.

Seems even The One's cheerleaders are getting a whiff of the coffee. 'Bout time.
Media & Technology Editor has tired of giving Obama the benefit of the doubt. In a lengthy essay from two days ago, Dennis Kneale calls Obama a “bully” and compares him to Richard Nixon for communication skills...
Kneale doesn’t support Arizona’s new immigration-enforcement law; in fact, he says he “hates it.” However, that kind of a response from a President hardly helps, and it ignores the Presidents’ role in a federal republic:

This is hubris at best and ignorance of the Constitution at worst. The U.S. was founded in part on the precept of states’ rights as an important counterweight to a rapacious federal government. Thus a President must step softly here, questioning gently but avoiding rancor and browbeating

.He goes on to say:

Similarly, President Obama maligns Wall Street for trying to have a say in financial reform and lobbying for its interests, though this input is a vital ingredient in any democratic process. Yet Obama doesn’t criticize giant unions like the AFL-CIO and the SEIU when they similarly lobby on fin-reg.

Why? Because the unions agree with him. Even though Wall Street has a far more legitimate claim to get involved in this debate than do the unions, which represent only 7% of the private work force and essentially should have no dog in this fight at all.

(via Hot Air)

Welcome to the real world, buddy. Sorry ya had to loose all those rainbows and unicorns!

He's not alone, either. From Politico:

Reporters say the White House is thin-skinned, controlling, eager to go over their heads and stingy with even basic information. All White Houses try to control the message. But this White House has pledged to be more open than its predecessors, and reporters feel it doesn’t live up to that pledge in several key areas...

Tuesday, April 27, 2010



And every damn word is the truth:

Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can't figure out what country you are the president of.
You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:
" We're no longer a Christian nation"
" America is arrogant" - (Your wife even
announced to the world," America is mean-
spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching
that nonsense to 23 generations of our
war dead buried all over the globe who
died for no other reason than to free a
whole lot of strangers from tyranny and
I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.
You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.
And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle...

Harold B. Estes
Snopes confirms as true:

Fortunately, we still have enough of a vestige of the Constitution to vote the enemy of America the hell out and violence is absolutely un-necessary and equally un-American!

Now if people decide to keep him, after all that has gone on, and all that is known of his sick, twisted mind, we will deserve the misery and slavery that we will get.

Sounds like an ad for the Klan, doesn't it? I feel sick to my stomach...

Yet, that was the argument of long-time ally, co-worker, friend and fellow revolutionary of The One, Bill Ayers.

No really.

From Moonbattery:

the President of the United States is a guy whose long-time friend, associate, and political mentor waged a terror war against the USA. But somehow the full import of this fact doesn't seem to have sunk in. Maybe bombing Americans is acceptable now; after all, Muslims do it, and it would be racist to criticize the Religion of Peace. But even aside from his terrorist activities, Bill Ayers offers alarming insight into the milieu that produced our current leadership. Donna Ron reminisces on the "defining event" of her life. She was in college, visiting Ayers in his attic apartment…
…when I was getting ready to leave Ayers told me I couldn't go until I slept with his roommate and his brother. At this point Bill and I had slept together just once. I was sexually inexperienced, having had only one serious boyfriend with whom I had recently broken up.
At first I thought Ayers was joking. I got up; and went to the door. He moved quickly to block me at the doorway. He locked the door and put the chain on it. I went to the couch and sat down and told him that I had no intention of having sex with his roommate and his brother or him. He said that I had no choice but to do as he said if I wanted to get out of there. He claimed that I wouldn't sleep with his married roommate because he was black — that I was a bigot.

Then as now, bullies could get the gullible to do pretty much anything by brandishing the "racism" charge. Donna submitted to rape.

I felt trapped. I had to get out of the situation I was in and because he was so effective a guilt-tripper, I also felt I had to prove to him that I wasn't a bigot. I got up from the couch and walked over to the black roommate's bed and put myself on it and he f*cked me. I went totally out of my body. I floated beside myself on the outside and above the bed looking at this black stranger f*ck me angrily while I hated myself....
The childhood mentor to BOTH Ayers and Obama was
Frank Marshall Davis ... a communist and a sexual deviant; Davis has bragged in print about raping a 13-year-old girl.
It's not enough not to hate someone based on their race. If you don't submit to hatred and rape, you're a bigot.

Got that?

This is where the Anti-American lowlife that duped his way into power comes from.



Details, details:

1. GM received almost $50 billion in bailout loans and is "repaying" less than $7 billion.

2. GM is "repaying" its Government taxpayer "loans" by raiding another bailout fund provided by taxpayers.

3. GM is also asking for another $10 billion in Government loans.

4. The Treasury Department rates the chances of GM repaying its bailout in full as somewhere between slim and none.

(Forbes, via Moonbattery)

So we sit in a haze, watch the commercial, and with that blatant lie firmly implanted in our heads, it's ON WITH THE SHOW! Everything's fine. Relax.

It's really amazing how quickly the lines between The State, what was once private industry and the media are being erased.

Total control. But don't call it Totalitarian. Hater.

There is never an answer to this simple question: Is or is not, breaking the law, illegal?

To the left, the law, and the Constitution are irrelevant. That is every day becoming more of a demonstrated fact.

If you believe in national soverienty, secure borders, and embrace immigrants that have come here legally, but not those that have not, you are a Nazi and hate Latinos.

Via Michelle Malkin, who has all the completely insane details of the protests over Arizona's decision to enforce the law:

The Arizona State Capitol has been the scene of many protests over the past few days. Now it’s the scene of vandalism.

Crews came in Monday morning and cleaned up refried beans that someone smeared over windows including Swastikas left on some House and Senate windows.

Irony? Bigots call them "beanos"

Further irony? EVERY legal Mexican immigrant that I have met, although I am sure there are others quite different, has embraced American, its laws, its Constitution and has appreciated and loved this country much more than the average American who's family has been here for generations.

And this from La Raza, a group who states in their mission statement, "For the race, everything. Outside the race, nothing." The group that the newest supreme court justice belongs to.

But that's not racist. Racial domination and genocide can only come from white people. After all, some of them drive pick-up trucks and stuff.



You know, all them protesters shouting "nigger." Picked up and widely reported to this day as the truth. Despite Breitbart offering $100,000 for evidence, despite tons of recording equipment, there is absolutely none.

If you pay any attention to what the MSM says, I'm sorry, you are being used, lied to, and played for a fool.

Now a new video:

Wednesday, April 21, 2010


(via Pookie's Toons)

(via The People's Cube)

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn`t buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative is a vegetarian he doesn't eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.(Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.

A liberal will delete it because he's "offended".

They dared to heckle The One True Risen Obamessiah over "don't ask don't tell."

Greg Gutfeld rightly calls them out on this blatantly racist behaviour:

I, for one, think it’s awesome to see gay activists stretching beyond the easy targets. Usually, they rag on Mormons, because they’ll take it – but ignore black churches because they won’t. So now, for once, they’re actually speaking truth to power.

But hold on.

I just wonder… couldn’t this heckling be a precursor to violent extremism? And could this agitation toward our President, believed to be based on policy – actually be thinly veiled racism? I mean, the President actually said he agreed with this gay group. And yet they still heckled. Perhaps the members of Get Equal should look in the mirror, and ask themselves why they’re so uncomfortable with a black man in the Oval Office. Perhaps Chris Matthews could ask this question for them. While Olbermann holds the mirror.

Don’t hold your breath – the hecklers weren’t tea partiers!

Oh yeah. That. Ok. They weren't racist. I forgot.

Hillary screaming about how everyone has a right to debate and disagree with any administration:

Any, that is, except this one. She was talking about the Bush Administration. Now debate and disagreement borders on treason, it's un-American and hateful.


While being interviewed about green energy, glo-bull warming and saving the environment, Princess Rahmbo willfully and blatantly went about expanding his carbon footprint by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere! He farted.

What I want to know is why, oh WHY does he hate the earth so much!?

Thats what Rep. John Dingle, the longest serving member of the house, said on the John "Dingleberry" Stewart show:

“People are afraid, frustrated, and don’t know who they’re mad at.”

Maybe it's just my experience and it's different for others, but when I constantly call someone stupid and arrogantly dismiss anything that they have to say, well, they seem, generally to get upset! Can you BELIEVE it?!

Let Freedom Ring:
The American people know exactly who they’re upset with and why they’re upset. Mostly, they’re upset that the Democrats aren’t listening to us. They’re upset that Democrats are doing their best to control every facet of our lives, whether it’s taking over the health care industry, financial institutions, student loans, car manufacturers and the energy industry.

But what their really doing is making stuff up because they're too stupid to understand the divine complexity of the new regime. Being stupid makes them scared. They don't know nuthin' the dumb hicks!

That's what ACORN CEO, Bertha Lewis says here at the Young Democratic Socialists winter conference ( Hitler's party was called the National Democratic Socialists...but that's just an un-related co-incidence):

Here is the CEO of ACORN, calling herself a socialist, saying that she's pushing a socialist agenda. From Gateway Pundit:
One of Barack Obama’s first big “community organizer” jobs involved ACORN in 1992. He worked along side ACORN before he became an elected official. Obama also trained ACORN employees. He represented ACORN in court. Obama worked with and protested with ACORN. His campaign donated $800,000 to ACORN in 2008 for voter registration efforts.
And, ACORN even canvassed for Obama in 2008.

In 2009 Obama promoted a top ACORN operative, Patrick Gaspard, who’s organization was fined $775,000 for election violations, to a top post in the White House. Gespard is helping shape domestic policy today.

Obama has appointed a self-described communist (Van Jones), a woman that spoke of her admiration for mass-murderer Chairman Mao (Anita Dunn), has himself spoken of his belief that the Constitution is flawed because it does not re-distribute wealth, in an interview in 2001:

... the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution...

... the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.

The reason the Constitution says what the government CANNOT do, not what it CAN do was essential to the Founding Fathers, who, at all costs wanted to constrain its possible growth into an all-encompassing power. That is what they had just fought a war to be free of. They wanted it's role to be minimal and to leave people the hell alone.

That to our President is a problem. The Constitution he was sworn to uphold is a problem. For him, it is essential to ignore the government's role as defined by the Constitution, and to accelerate it's transformation into an all-powerful wealth re-distributive engine. What you have will be decided by those who know better than you what you need and deserve. Your rights will come from the government not God, as the Founders stated:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness... (Declaration of Independence)

Notice: endowed by their Creator, not their government.

Notice: pursuit of happiness, not guarantee of happiness. You are free to pursue owning a home. You are not guaranteed to own a home.

Yet we are told home ownership, healthcare, and an increasing long list of other things that we are free to pursue are "our rights."

Those rights are nowhere to be found in the Constitution or Declaration.

Yet SOMEHOW, despite all of this, it is still seen as a smear, even hate-speech, to call him a socialist, let alone Marxist, communist or fascist.

Yes, fascist. Lets get one thing straight, Fascism is on the LEFT not the RIGHT. Communists want the state to OWN all private business. Fascists want to CONTROL all private business. It's why Mussolini said,

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power”

Lessee. The gov't has merged with banking, housing, the auto industry and health care, giving them, According to Michelle Bachman, control of 51% of what was once private industry. Now they are going for cap n' tax, controlling CARBON, the carbon that touches EVERY industry, the carbon that is in every breath you exhale.

But don't call that fascist.

In reality, I suppose the only truly accurate label for the policies of The One True Arisen Obamessiah and his minions is Statism- an all powerful, all controlling state. It is where Democrats and even many so-called Republicans have been taking us for years. Obama has merely floored the accelerator, pedal to the metal. Statism fits because they are, after all, post-modernists. A lil' dab of Marxism, a lil' dab of Fascism, what ever it takes to put them selves in a situation of total control, to distribute favor according to their whims. Since they see themselves as so intelligent, spiritual, highly evolved and benevolent, they feel they have a right to that power. And of course, they want that power because they just want to help you.

That is what the benevolent slave owners told themselves in the old south. The slaves were to0 primitive and stupid to help themselves, so he was doing them a favor by keeping them in chains to work for him in exchange for the little bit of food and clothing that he knew they could not possibly go out and get for themselves. This was a very popular narrative, especially in southern literature just after the civil war, reminiscing about "the happy darkies" in the good 'ol days.

He made them slaves to help them.

Oddly enough, the slaves thought they would be just fine with freedom.

If MSNBC and CNN were around back then, those slaves would have been called violent extremists and a danger to society.

People like Bertha Lewis are the supreme irony of our time.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010


It's a necessary fact of human existence. Think for a minute. If you took every bit of information that you receive from your senses and see it as an isolated bit, unique in itself, and do not connect it with other information to make a reasonable generalization, what would happen?

If every time I stuck my hand in the fire it got burnt, but I didn't generalize that fire always burns my hand, I'm gonna end up with very un-attractive charcoal stumps before long.

If I decide to hang out with crack-heads in a dope house, and 99x out of 100 something bad, violent or tragic happens, I would generalize that maybe I shouldn't be hangin' there. That is a generalization. It allows me to make sense of the world and keep myself safe. But if I don't generalize and know that that one time out of a hundred, everything was cool, I'll conclude that its fine to be there.

This is M.O. of the left's moral equivalency tactic. For instance: not every terrorist attack in the world is perpetrated by radical Islamicists. Only 99%. Therefore, it is not only wrong, but bigoted, to point out the huge threat we face from radical Islamicists. That is a generalization and so it's wrong.

That is insane. Generalizations are necessary to live your life, beyond question. The real question should be: are your generalizations based on rational evidence beyond a reasonable doubt and how tightly do you hold onto them? That is rationality.

John Stewart, attacking Bernie Goldberg for "generalizing," has for the second time, told Fox News, "Go f*** yourself." And here I thought it was the Tea Party that routinely screamed profanities! My bad. All that clingin' to my guns and religion musta cut off the flow of blood to my brain there for a second!

Bernie's smack down on Mr. Edgy and Smug:

Why so angry? I'm here to HELP you! I don't think you're being rational. Now give it up.


Because anyone upset at having their liberty taken away, their children and their children being made slaves to The State and the Constitution being ignored MUST be stupid.

Don't they know their saviors when they see them? Don't they know that standing up instead of staying on their knees, where they belong, is "irrational anger" and hatred?

Stupid public!

Listen to this compassionate plea from Rep. John Conyers:

The screaming profanity and racial insults he's speaking of? Those would be the words that ol' Stretchy-face Pelosi and her comrades purposely tried to provoke by marching through a crowd of protesters, smirking and holding a gavel. The words that, despite the $100,000 dollars offered for proof, still are completely un-substantiated. The words that the accusers are now back-tracking on. Yeah, those words. But he doesn't let reality interfere with his own, personal, disconnected reality. He caaaaares for people!

Hot Air

..(it's) straight out of the left’s dimestore psychoanalysis handbook: Tea partiers are too dumb/angry/racist to know what’s in their own best interest, so we’re better off ignoring them — and, I guess, the gigantic majority that’s angry at government right now — and passing whatever insane liberal boondoggles we like. Because ultimately, those boondoggles are for their own good, right? This is unvarnished nanny statism, as condescending as you’ll ever hear it formulated. It’s not that the government can make better decisions for you than you can, it’s that you’re too much of a rage-drenched wretch to make good decisions in the first place. There’s your Democratic Party campaign slogan for November.

What an AWESOME video! Just listen to these "racists!"

Details, details....don't bother them with details! All hail the Glorious Marxist Revolution...or ELSE.


Gutfeld talking about Clinton's recent remarks warning that "the current climate" is what brought about the Oklahoma City bombing:
He says, “we owe it to victims,” not to cross this line again. We? It’s as if he’s asking all of us not to blow up buildings. Generally, people who would agree to that weren’t planning on it anyway.

And later when he mentions “contentious” and “partisan” types, it only makes me think of… Clinton. When his face wasn’t red with embarrassment, it was red with anger. And sometimes, ketchup.

But more important, is the whole “current climate” thing. Fact is, this time is no more violent than any time before, and most likely less. Look at the vast tea parties from last week. I’ve seen scarier office picnics.

So when Captain Busyhands talks about the “vast echo chamber,” he’s really talking about people like him who constantly smear their intellectual adversaries as violent racists.

And as he earlier pointed out, since the left has had so little success in finding actual racism and hatred at tea parties, they decided this last time to manufacture what wasn't there to....prove that it was there.

Boggles the mind. And the result? FAIL. People at the Tea Parties despise racist scum and shamed the infiltrators right out.

The Marxist left that now controls the Democratic party WANT racism and hatred, and they are praying that some lone fringe nutjob will do something violent. Pain? Suffering? Death? As long as it helps the Glorious Revolution, it's a GOOD thing. And no, I'm not saying everyone that has been duped by them or duped themselves, believes that. I'm saying that that is what the people controlling their party want. Just like Che, Lenin, Mao...the list goes on....and these are people that they see as heroes and prophets in their Fundamentalist Post-Modern Marxist Church!

iOwnTheWorld agrees:

They aren’t frightened that anything like this will happen, they are frightened that it WON’T happen before November. We already know about their warped “anything for the team” mindset. Remember Melissa Lafsky-stock? Remember the “Maybe Mary Jo would have felt it was worth it” (Drunken coward Ted Kennedy skating on the homicide of Mary Jo) rant? This tells you what goes on in their soulless skulls.

Ward Churchill, and other leftists, basked in the soot of 9/11, saying that we deserved it. It’s not much of a leap to think that they hope and pray for more massive death that they can use to their political advantage.

(Oh, and in case you think all this Obama=Jesus stuff is over the top, check out his own words, via Is Barack Obama the Messiah:

"... a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama" - Barack Obama Lebanon, New Hampshire.
January 7, 2008.)


According to Bill Clinton, the ideas of this man are dangerous and lead people to do things like the Oklahoma City bombing. Evidence? You don't need no evidence! Shut up and think what you're told!


Eject Eject Eject
has a great posting of the words of our Founding Fathers, that are identical to the goals and aspirations of the Tea Party movement.

For instance, the Tea Party is horrified by the recklessly growing unsustainable debt that will be on the backs of generations to come. Thomas Jefferson:
“The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

Them dang extremist Tea Partiers want to go back to having the small federal government that pretty much is just there to provide for the common defense and then leave us alone to pass other legislation in the individual states- as is stated in the Constitution. George Washington:
“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”
Its a very complete list and well work checking out. THESE ideas are what the left is calling racist, dangerous and extreme. Well, they ARE the socialist revolution- hence their hysteria and lies.

Sunday, April 18, 2010


Greg Gutfeld
nails the absurdity of the Tea Party infiltrators:

So a hater of the Tea Party movement claims he plans to destroy the group, by infiltrating it and then having his cohorts act racist and homophobic. He thinks manufacturing this behavior can devastate the party's reputation....'s what I love: The guy's goal is to act racist and homophobic, in order to create...proof of racism and homophobia! Which means, he's pretty much proved that none of it exists in the tea parties, if he has to go to the trouble of importing the stuff. types have been branding the Tea Partiers as extremists since day one. Now, for lack of examples- they must create behavior they cannot substantiate.


An Obama-lovin' soldier sent a rap song to the pentagon where he threatens to "put people in the hospital" and says:

"I gotta **** magazine with 30 rounds, on a 3 round burst, ready to fire down"

His threat to kill fellow soldiers and political leaders has been quickly defended and websites supporting him have sprouted up all over like poisonous weeds.

A spokesman for Veterans Against the War poo-pooed all the fuss and said, "it's just a song."

Anyhow, we all know the real threats of violence come from the Tea Party. What about that "bombs bursting in air" line in their song, the national anthem? Haters! This guy is just expressing his feeeeeelings and is speaking truth to power! Sorta like the Fort Hood gunman.

(via Weasel Zippers)
See? The Obamessiah has was working to make the world safer even before he was elected! He's ON it! (image via Hillbuzz)


The NYTimes just published a leaked memo. But this time, it's not information that can be used by our enemies to kill more of our brave men and women, as is their usual editorial policy. It's this:
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has warned in a secret three-page memorandum to top White House officials that the United States does not have an effective long-range policy for dealing with Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear capability...

LIES! All LIES! Kissing ass, bowing and begging, hog-tying our troops, treating our enemies as U.S. citizen, dis-arming ourselves and letting the glow of his peace and love vibe shine for all who hate us IS a strategy! Try it:

If you find yourself at gunpoint being mugged or raped, just smile, tell them you are a really good person and that you love them. The gun will magically turn into a flower! Works every time.

So President Jugears has rightly responded that it's all very complex (his often-used phrase meaning, "you're too stupid to understand") and that he's been on this since January.

agrees. He has always had a plan. Obama is not Bush. That's the plan:

How could they possibly fathom that diplomacy might fail? The core plank of “smart power,” such as it is, has always been the Obama charm offensive. Simply by being the anti-Bush and offering an open hand to Iran, he would convince Tehran to unclench its fist and open a dialogue. Bush was the problem (he always is!) and once the problem was removed, solutions would inevitably follow. So why bother developing a Plan B?

NO ONE can fail to be swayed by his omnipotent charm!

So relax, love the earth and take a unicorn to work with a smile on your face.

And if by some miracle, we do get attacked, we deserve it anyhow. In the words of The One's spiritual mentor, "God damn America," and if you don't believe that, you hate Jesus. And the earth. And the poor. And the black man. And gays. And.......

Saturday, April 17, 2010


I have seen more and more of S.E. Cupp the last year or so, and the more I do, the more I love her.

Had no idea she was an atheist or that she had just written, “Losing Our Religion: The Liberal Media’s Attack on Christianity.”

She might not agree but MAN does The Lord ever work in mysterious ways! Who woulda thought?

She was interviewed about her book at Newsmax:

Cupp maintains in her book “Losing Our Religion” that the mainstream media in America are openly hostile toward Christianity. She explains why:
“I think the media is socially secular and increasingly so, and I think the judgment and the morality inherent in Christianity or any religious system is really threatening to a secularist movement like the media. If the media can go on unjudged, I think that makes them fairly happy.” ...

Personally, I think it's just a natural reaction of the darkness railing against the light (or maybe the water of life):

"Melting! Melting! What a world...what a world!"

But I digress. She goes on to say:

The “worst offenders” include be, Cupp says. “CNN is pretty bad. The New York Times is pretty bad only because of the clout and influence that paper has. You would expect them to be a bit more responsible. MSNBC is terrible. Some of the talking heads there like Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews — these guys really have it out for Christianity.”

Asked why Cupp, as an atheist, would write a book so strongly defending Christianity, she said: “I am an atheist but I’m not one of those militant atheists. I simply don’t believe. I envy the faithful. I’ve always defended religious freedom. I’m grateful for mine and I’m grateful for everyone else’s.

“I defend especially Christianity in this country because it seems to be under attack, and I’m bothered by the idea that the media has taken a side in this fight. I’m really bothered as a writer, as a member of the press, that the Fourth Estate has become so openly hostile to 80 percent of the country. This is a huge majority. And 90 percent of the country believes in God.

“To go after a majority like this means they’re really not a representative media. They don’t deserve to be called mainstream.”

Catch her on Red Eye on Fox sometime. Woman ROCKS.


Reports of the hatred and violence experienced by "the gays" when attacked by extremist tea party bigots have been rolling in! My God. It's like Matthew Shepard times 10!

Gay Patriot reports on a Boston Tea Party victim:
Great crowd, everyone reacted positively. They wanted to take photos and gave me thumbs up. Some asked how I felt about being there. My most frequent response was I feel better coming out gay here today with the tea party people then coming out conservative in my gay community. Tried to turn the crowd away from the alinsky provacteurs, they were all there with the racist mispelled signs, so sad they were so young.

Even more horrific is this report, on the LA Tea Party:

This crowd was most welcoming of the GayPatriot readers who showed up, 8 by my count, 2 straight women, 1 left-leaning lesbian and five gay men. We made known our sexuality, they made us feel welcome, more welcome indeed than many of us felt when we make known our conservatism (or just plain iconoclasm) at Gay Pride events.

Two of us (two gay men, that is) even got speaking berths. I spoke very briefly, telling the crowd that Barney Frank does not speak for gay people and that many gay Americans favor small government and prefer freedom. Wearing a “Reagan in ‘80″ T-shirt and Reagan ballcap, I called the Gipper the president of my youth whose ideas are the ideas of the future. I received a resounding round of applause–which didn’t end when I, with a jovial grin on my face, said, “We’re Here, We’re Queer, We want to Repeal Obamacare.

Those fag-bashing BASTARDS! APPLAUSE! What's next? A free trip to a day spa?!!!!

I hear ya! Fight the power brothers and sisters!

Outraged readers had similar stories in the comments:

I’m making many friends from the local Tea Party movement, and they’re great folks.

When I tell my “progressive” friends how I’m expanding my horizons, the response is often to scream “TEA PARTY PEOPLE?! ARE YOU CRAZY?!” and do everything just short of setting their hair on fire.

I am routinely lectured on how “evil” these people are. We are straying from the reservation in greater numbers all the time, and it is making a lot of people very nervous.

This is exactly how the Left became so lazy, flabby and insipid. They’ve been counting on the bigotry of “those people” they’re sure they hate. And it turns out that the bigotry has been largely, all along, in their own, tiny minds. better be sitting down for this sick, sick scene. Its like somethin' straight outa Nightmare on Elm Street (yes, I'm sorry. I said "straight"):

I carried “Yo Media, I’m A Tea Partier And I’m Gay” to the Orlando Tea Party on Monday 4-12-2010 and will have it in Kissmmee with me today at Tax Day Tea Party there. Great responses! Everyone wanted pictures and to shake my hand and thank me.

In the face of all this hatred from the straight, white, violent, stupid, redneck, homophobic, racist, mysogenistic, un-American, nazi, klansman tea party movement, I hope you'll all join hands with me RIGHT NOW and sing "weeeee will overcoooooome! weeeeee will overcoooooome!"

Reason #584 why I left the art world behind (pun intended):

Several nude models who are featured in Marina Abramovic's new exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art have complained of being groped by some patrons...

One performer, Will Rawls, told The New York Times that a patron brushed his hand chest and back "and then touched my butt." ... "As he was passing me he looked me in the eyes and said 'You feel good, man,"' Rawls said. (Fox)

The kicker:

The exhibition... includes nude performers standing in a narrow doorway facing each other as visitors squeeze between them. rub against naked people you are "sqeezing" past and they are outraged when you touch them. Alright.

In other news today, hookers are suing johns for buying what they're selling.

It's just art.