Monday, February 09, 2009

SO WHY IS THE CENSUS MOVING TO THE WHITEHOUSE A BIG DEAL?

GOP lawmakers are pointing out that the new structure will effectively leave White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel — a former chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — in a decision-making position regarding how Census business is conducted.

“The Census is supposed to be not only outside of politics, but transparent,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “This implies that President Obama intends on getting a count to his liking. It borders on overt political corruption.”

While the program to count and compile data on Americans might not seems political, the reapportionment of House seats based on the decennial census has huge political ramifications. In addition, the census data will be used to determine funding formulas for a wide range of government programs. (Pajamas Media)

The Obamunist is brilliant in his efforts to destroy this country and implement permanent, total control. Chipping away the Consititution he finds so problematic, one bit at a time.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama described the U.S. Constitution as having “deep flaws” during a September 2001 Chicago public radio program (Newsmax)
From the that deeply flawed document:

The Congress, by law directed that:

"The Secretary [of Commerce]
shall perform the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title,
may issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out
such functions and duties, and may delegate the performance of such
functions and duties and the authority to issue such rules and
regulations to such officers and employees of the Department of
Commerce as he may designate."

As I read it, the Director of the Census must, by law, be within the Department of Commerce
and under the direction of the (Senate approved) Secretary of Commerce
who then reports to the president. Am I missing something? (via Ace of Spades)


In trashing the Constitution and bringing about totalitarian socialism, Jugears knows that the only way to boil a frog is to turn up the heat slowly.

For our own good, of course.

1 comment:

23eagle said...

If that could happen, Nancy Pelosi and the New York Times would be prosecuted for treason. Giving away state secrets and aiding and abetting the enemy seem to me to fit the definition. Of course, that would infringe on the left's "right" to destroy their own country.