Tuesday, August 18, 2009

RACIST DEMOCRATS IN PATHETIC OVERDRIVE

Frank J. Fleming says that even though he was not at ALL for Obama, he did think that he may be a guy that would finally bring us to "move past silly race issues." Then the coffee came:

So here we are: A black Democrat has been elected president, and suddenly
all the positions on health care and taxes conservatives have always had are now
racist. And I have come to the now obvious conclusion that America can never
become post-racial while electing Democrats.
Liberals have always had a
problem debating with conservatives. They don’t really understand conservatives’
attraction to individualism and honor and responsibility enough to be able to
come up with coherent responses when people say they want low taxes and a small
government. All liberals know is that they are very smart, and everyone else is
very dumb for not seeing how smart they are and that they should run everything.
So they come up with childish name-calling, such as “conservatives are greedy”
and “conservatives are evil” to try and shut up what they don’t understand. And
they find there is nothing better than the cry of “racism.”
No one likes to
be called a racist — it’s about the same level as being called a pedophile — and
it’s great for liberals to use, because there is very little defense for the
charge. You are basically guilty until proven innocent — and you can’t prove
yourself innocent. When called a racist, you can say, “No, I am not a racist.”
To which the liberal can respond, “Though you try to hide it, I think deep down
you are.” And there’s not much else you can do except maybe punch the guy in the
face. But if the guy calling you racist is a minority, that itself might be de
facto racism.

...now that they have a black president and all politics can be traced back
to him, they’re free to cry racism for absolutely any political opinion contrary
to Obama’s positions. And with public opinion already turning against the
president and no other arguments left, that’s what they’ll do.
Why did people
join in tea parties to protest runaway spending? Racism, says Janeane Garofalo
to a nodding Keith Olbermann. Why are people against a bloated government
takeover of health care? Racism, says Nobel Prize-winning New York Times
columnist Paul Krugman. MSNBC anchor Carlos Watson said that “socialist” is the
new “N” word. Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta-Journal Constitution declared 45% to
65% of town hall protesters racists. Representative John Dingell compared
protesters to the KKK.
It’s pretty mindless, though some try to dress it up
to look smart — as liberals love to do. (It was almost entertaining to see Phillip
Kennicot in the Washington Post
try to show that depicting Obama as the
Joker is racist, when in as many steps he could have just as easily shown it was
commentary on how Obama is like Kevin Bacon). Still, it’s the debate equivalent
of liberals covering their ears and screaming, “Shut up! Shut up!” And why not
when they know that if the debate actually centered on the specifics of health
care, or Obama’s spending, they would lose big?



Democrats and 8year olds, same debating technique: "Shut up! You're nothing but a big stupid dumb-head nong nong! Nyah!"

No comments: