WHOOPIE DEFENDS CHILD RAPE...BECAUSE SHE IS SO INTELLIGENT

"It wan't RAPE rape."

Time and again. To the left, criminals deserve compassion. I mean, ANYBODY can feel bad for a victim, to champion murderers and rapists...DAMN! That's cutting edge! That makes you look so very very SPECIAL.

And THAT is what the left is all about.

Not goodness. Not the real world. Not fairness.

It's always all about THEM.

Exhibit A:

IF WE'RE ALL EQUALLY MISERABLE....WELL, AT LEAST WE'RE EQUAL! YEA!

MORE PICS OF TEA PARTY PEOPLE WITH SWASTIKAS

Kidding. They are from Sunday's protest against the rule of law.

Still waiting for Ol' Stretchy face Pelosi to get all teary-eyed about the swastikas.

Check 'em all at Verum Serum.)

Meanwhile, Der Messiah is on record now saying he's not for or against the boycotts of AZ.



Divide and conquer. That's the number one tool he and other Marxists use to bamboozle the public into going along with their destruction of America.

It's all from Saul Alinsky's bible (you know, the one he dedicated to Satan:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer).

If you don't believe this, check his words (via Soda Head)

"The use of The Ideology of Change and Hope" Alinsky proclaims "is a power technique (and) is key to mobilizing 'the dispossessed' to ban together and create pressure on the system".

Sound at ALL familiar? So lets check Mr. Alinsky's character:

"Lie, dissemble, ridicule and deride your opponents... do what you need to do to get ahead. Listen to and learn their needs and take advantage - do not care. Manipulate the morals. Lying is never wrong as long as it leads you to a position of power. Say what you need to say to get ahead. The ends justify the means."

Is THAT familiar? Should be. It's what Perfesser Obama TAUGHT.

...AND SOME WAGU STEAK!

THEY DON'T CALL IT "LAND OF THE LOST" FER NUTHIN!

THE LEFT'S WORSE NIGHTMARE....

Americans being Americans first.

THIS GUY IS FAST BECOMING MY NEW FAVORITE POLITICIAN!

Wow. He keeps telling the un-varnished, un-focus-group-spun, TRUTH. Remember that? Truth? He's like a cool refreshing breeze blowing through Hell.



BTW, Hot Air reports this teacher makes $86,000 a year.

Yes, I weep for her pain too.

NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY? THAT IS SO OLD FASHIONED!

We are all citizens of the world first. World bodies have the ultimate say, not Washington.

And so, elected officials in AZ and Mexico are taking AZ to the world court:

NOGALES, May 25, 2010 .- To reverse the effects of SB-1070, legislators in Mexico and the U.S. (EU) have agreed to submit an appeal to the Interamerican Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), since this initiative criminalises migration with racial profiling in the state of Arizona.

...The conclave was attended by U.S. lawmakers: Amanda Aguirre, Linda Brown, Linda Lopez, Manuel “Manny” Alvarez, Manny Ruiz, Martin Porchas, Rick Flores and Rudy Molera. (via Verum Serum)

The U.S. being made subservient to international governance? Just a wacky right-wing conspiracy theory. Ignore the recent words of our oh-so-patriotic leader:



That's right. He's telling men and women at West Point that they are not here to serve the U.S. They here as troops for the new world order.

Funny, I don't remember agreeing to be part of a world order. I don't remember electing anyone to it. I don't remember having any say at all. And yet, increasingly, we are told we are to be subservient to something higher than the Constitution.

The President is sworn to uphold the Constitution as the highest rule of law and to protect our nation. He is not sworn to uphold the laws of international bodies as the highest rule, nor to to put our troops under direction of an international governance.

In other words, he is violating his oath. He is blatantly anti-American.

Of course, he won't be impeached. But you better pray that he is voted out or it is over.

THE FIRST KLINGON'S COMMENCEMENT SPEECH

I love Robin of Berkeley, partly because she was a deluded, far left idiot just like me for most of her life but finally grew up a little and began to discover clues to what sanity looks like.

She reviews lil' Miss "I'm proud of my country for the first time"'s speech to the kids she is helping to enslave to The State:

Michelle Obama recently gave a speech to graduates at George Washington University. The underlying message? Do as I say, not as I do.

Also: Life sucks, and then you die. There's war and famine and an overcooked planet. Become global citizens and fix the mess! Clean the feet of lepers in Calcutta, eradicate malaria in the Sudan, and live like a monk with no personal needs.

Of course, Michelle's own personal journey has been a tad different. After she graduated from racist-infested Princeton University, Michelle made big bucks as a corporate lawyer. Working as a vice president of the University of Chicago Medical Center, she saved the hospital a bundle through patient-dumping -- sending those unable to pay to other hospitals.

Michelle, who as First Lady requires 22 personal assistants, apparently helped Barack make millions by helping convince unrepentant domestic terrorist and Hyde Park neighbor Bill Ayers to ghostwrite his long-overdue autobiography.

Not wanting to live in one of those dreary third-world shacks, Barack and Michelle entered into a shady land deal with corrupt businessman Tony Rezko, who helped the couple buy million-dollar-plus digs that were a financial stretch.

Then she writes what SHE would have said. Check it out.

To give The Negative Vibe Merchant credit though, she is being perfectly consistent to the mainstream of academia. She is no different.

Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others....due, no doubt, to the aweful burden they bear for having to control every aspect of everyone else's life with their towering intellects and deep spirituality.

Sacrifice is necessary....but for other people. God forbid anyone 'intellectual" would have to give up time on their yoga mat or money that they planned on using for the latest, hip, see-and-be-seen restaurant.

Those are things they deserve and although sacrifice is good, no one important should ever, ever feel any discomfort, let alone pain. I mean, what did the hippies fight for!?

Well, except for them dumb rednecks, you know.....

Besides, if the Marxist elite would make sacrifices for others themselves, well....they would be almost, like....Christian! They are MUCH more spiritually enlightened than THAT!

I LOVE ME SOME SWINGIN' COUNTRY NOW!

THE GRADUATION SPEECH YOUR KIDS DIDN'T HEAR

THANK GOD FOR PEOPLE LIKE THIS:

FINALLY! MORE THAN A MONTH LATER, THE FEDS ACT ON THE OIL SPILL!

They are quadrupling the tax on oil. My heroes!

Responding to the massive BP oil spill, Congress is getting ready to quadruple—to 32 cents a barrel—a tax on oil ... (AP)

I just KNEW the solution was to take more of our money!

Meanwhile, Bobby Jindal rips them a new one:



So were is the light in all this dark mass of crude? States are more and more waking up to the fact that the federal government is NOT the answer and that they need to take back the power that is rightfully theirs under the Constitution and say goodbye to mommy and daddy Big Government. First Arizona, now Louisiana.

More wisdom than the entire staff of The New York Times.

THE MAN THAT HATES AND HOLDS IN CONTEMPT THE COUNTRY HE SEEKS TO RULE

Anyone that thinks Der Messiah loves this country and what it stands for is either delusional, woefully uninformed or a flat out liar.

I'm sorry. But as Cheech and Chong once famously said, "looks like dog sh*t. Smells like dog sh*t. Taste! Taste! Ok. Taste like dog sh*t"

Of course, despite the fact that they were stoned outa their gourds, they had the sense not to step in it.

The MSM, on the other hand, not only steps in it, they BATHE in it as if it were eu d' cologne.

John Hawkins runs down just a lil' bit of the evidence.

Now TELL me.....

Ace of Spades with more...

And Jared E. Peterson at American Thinker doesn't mince words either:

When America is being invaded by a foreign power, one expects the President of the United States to be on America's side. That's how it's worked in the past, anyway. If that's too steep a demand, could we ask that our president not publicly endorse the enemy's characterization of modest defensive efforts as "discriminatory"? If even that decent silence is too much, could our president at least not provide the invaders' leader with a White House venue to denounce our people and our laws?

Note to those Americans who have not yet noticed: Barrack Hussein Obama does not like or sympathize with this country.

His instinctual affinities are with others, particularly if they come from the southern hemisphere or call themselves Muslims, and especially if they vote Democrat when they get here. For a long time, some have known this about America's first anti-American president. Many have not yet perceived it. Had most Republican members of Congress not been asleep, confused, or afraid, the events of last week could have cast a brilliant light on this awful truth.

But exposing the charlatan when he allows the truth to spill out, as he did last week, requires a courageous, clear-thinking, and articulate opposition. Other than Representative McClintock and a few more, who among key GOP officeholders possesses these traits?

Exactly. Who?

Go on. Have some. Sweet...tasty....crunchy....DEADLY! Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!

GLOBAL WARMING CAUSES KILLER CORNFLAKES!

Stop laughing! It's TRUE! Experts have said so, and if you don't believe it, it's only because you're a stupid redneck that hates the earth.

Numberwatch has put together a full page of links to all the horrible things that dis-proven man-made global warming has brought upon us.

You have GOT to look at this! Hil-freakin-lareous!!!!

BUT DON'T CALL IT MARXIST

We still have free enterprise....sorta..... so stop being a "fear monger!"

Paychecks from private business shrank to their smallest share of personal income in U.S. history during the first quarter of this year, a USA TODAY analysis of government data finds.

At the same time, government-provided benefits — from Social Security, unemployment insurance, food stamps and other programs — rose to a record high during the first three months of 2010. (via USA Today, of all places!)

Want to make money? Work for The State, where you will be lavishly paid with the money stolen from those who make less and less.

As Margaret Thatcher once said,

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money [to spend]."

Look at Greece. Look at the rest of the Europe that is increasingly smelling the coffee of reality that we are going full-bore away from here.

Oh course in answer to the question, "where has Marxism EVER worked, let alone not killed millions upon millions?" the answer continues to be, "well, no one has ever had the RIGHT person in total control." We do now, and he's not only the right person, he's the One True Risen Obamessiah!

What could go wrong? Hater!

BOB HOPE....TRUTHIN'! GOD BLESS HIS SOUL.

IF YOU'RE AGAINST FEDERAL REGULATION OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, YOU ARE RACIST.

What did Rand Paul actually say? Via Red State:

...the media and left are out saying Rand Paul would have opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
He never said he would have voted against the Civil Rights Act. In fact, he said he supported key provisions in the Civil Rights Act.

Here is the relevant portion of the transcript:

SIEGEL: You’ve said that business should have the right to refuse service to anyone, and that the Americans with Disabilities Act, the ADA, was an overreach by the federal government. Would you say the same by extension of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

Dr. PAUL: What I’ve always said is that I’m opposed to institutional racism, and I would’ve, had I’ve been alive at the time, I think, had the courage to march with Martin Luther King to overturn institutional racism, and I see no place in our society for institutional racism.

SIEGEL: But are you saying that had you been around at the time, you would have - hoped that you would have marched with Martin Luther King but voted with Barry Goldwater against the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

Dr. PAUL: Well, actually, I think it’s confusing on a lot of cases with what actually was in the civil rights case because, see, a lot of the things that actually were in the bill, I’m in favor of. I’m in favor of everything with regards to ending institutional racism. So I think there’s a lot to be desired in the civil rights [act]. And to tell you the truth, I haven’t really read all through it because it was passed 40 years ago and hadn’t been a real pressing issue in the campaign, on whether we’re going for the Civil Rights Act.

SIEGEL: But it’s been one of the major developments in American history in the course of your life. I mean, do you think the ‘64 Civil Rights Act or the ADA for that matter were just overreaches and that business shouldn’t be bothered by people with the basis in law to sue them for redress?

Dr. PAUL: Right. I think a lot of things could be handled locally. For example, I think that we should try to do everything we can to allow for people with disabilities and handicaps. You know, we do it in our office with wheelchair ramps and things like that. I think if you have a two-story office and you hire someone who’s handicapped, it might be reasonable to let him have an office on the first floor rather than the government saying you have to have a $100,000 elevator. And I think when you get to the solutions like that, the more local the better, and the more common sense the decisions are, rather than having a federal government make those decisions.

You can agree or disagree, but there is nothing about his position that is racist. But of course that didn't stop the MSM from saying that opposition to Obamacare is racist or that calling him socialist is racist, or that protesting out of control spending is racist.

What we have learned, is that if you disagree with anything that the left is jamming down our throats, you are racist.

From Hot Air:

America’s leftists... have long considered it wrong for those on the right to oppose central government action on the principle of limiting the federal government to enumerated powers. But in the decades of my life, this point of contention has shifted from an honest political debate to the enforcement of a religious doctrine. No longer are logical arguments made from the left. Partisans of the left’s point of view merely express reflexive horror, demonize those making the limited-government argument, and invoke the horrible problem – whatever it is (or was) – as the evidence that it is essentially satanic to oppose doing the thing they propose to do about it. Logical and temperate discourse has no place in this dynamic; it is reminiscent mainly of fire-and-brimstone demagoguery.

This is not just a dangerous way to make law, it’s a way that must inevitably lead to greater and greater overreach. Nothing we do, nothing we are is protected from the federal government if we sit still for these elisions and ellipses in our observance of constitutional limits. Most of the first ten Amendments can be effectively abrogated – and the abrogation called due process of law – by the exercise of the “authority to regulate interstate commerce,” or by findings based on “privacy” and the Fourteenth Amendment, or by the exercise of eminent domain.

Letting the federal government overreach in its application of these concepts, first in one instance and then in another and another, is what has led to the individual purchase mandate for health insurance and the other assumptions of federal authority in Obamacare. Under the Obama executive and the current Congress, every effort is being made to extend that authority far beyond what most Americans consider appropriate, from centrally regulating the thermostat in your home to forcing the internet into the “common carrier” model of television and radio, so that content can be regulated by virtual channelization and access- or broadcast-licensing procedures. (Bloggers, that means you.)

Tacit, unexamined acceptance of federal authority to do these things is what Rand Paul is challenging. In 2010, he is the one asking people to think, rather than to merely repeat doctrinaire talking points taught to them since birth. His critics, on the other hand, sound like nothing so much as children reciting a catechism, and tsk-tsk-ing over those who don’t recite it in exactly the same way. That includes many of his critics on the right – who have agreed to be governed by a list of pieties that makes effective dissent from the left’s religious doctrine impossible.

As I have said before, The First Church of Fundamentalist Leftism IS a religion and one that is being increasingly enforced as a state religion, while all others (Islam possibly excepted) are silenced under the "freedom FROM religion" misreading of the Constitution's "freedom OF religion."

Any dissent from the one, true State religion, especially by them dang "Bible-clinging" idiots, must be crushed. No wonder the left doesn't get so bent over Islamofascism. Birds of a feather.

Day by Day (see their toons every day on the right sidebar)

SAME TACTICS, DIFFERENT SHIRTS.

Hitler had his brownshirts. The One has his purple shirts (SEIU).

They are the thugs, along with ACORN with whom they blend, that use violence and intimidation to further The Glorious Revolution to "fundamentally re-make America."

First they entered board meetings of lending institutions, surrounding them. They protested at banks. Members in the house and senate were told that they were racist if they didn't support lending for homes to those that could not afford it. So began our economic downfall.

They they put a man in the hospital at a Tea Party for selling "don't tread on me" flags, calling him the n-word as they beat him.

Now this:

Last Sunday, on a peaceful, sun-crisp afternoon, our toddler finally napping upstairs, my front yard exploded with 500 screaming, placard-waving strangers on a mission to intimidate my neighbor, Greg Baer. Baer is deputy general counsel for corporate law at Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), a senior executive based in Washington, D.C. And that — in the minds of the organizers at the politically influential Service Employees International Union and a Chicago outfit called National Political Action — makes his family fair game.

Waving signs denouncing bank “greed,” hordes of invaders poured out of 14 school buses, up Baer’s steps, and onto his front porch. As bullhorns rattled with stories of debtor calls and foreclosed homes, Baer’s teenage son Jack — alone in the house — locked himself in the bathroom. “When are they going to leave?” Jack pleaded when I called to check on him…

Now this event would accurately be called a “protest” if it were taking place at, say, a bank or the U.S. Capitol. But when hundreds of loud and angry strangers are descending on your family, your children, and your home, a more apt description of this assemblage would be “mob.” Intimidation was the whole point of this exercise, and it worked-even on the police. A trio of officers who belatedly answered our calls confessed a fear that arrests might “incite” these trespassers. (via Hot Air)

Those would be the police that escorted the mob to the house.

And no, Der Messiah is not Hitler. He's not Lenin or Mao either. He's making his own brand of Totalitarianism. He's a creative guy....and smrt to boot! (jack boot, that is)

SO TELL ME WHY AGAIN WE ARE NOT HAVING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST OUR No. 1 "CITIZEN OF THE WORLD"?

He said we are "not defined by our borders."



It is a clear statement of being against NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY.

No surprise, as he has repeated said that he is a citizen of the world.

But tell me, how can ANYONE in the house and senate, that considers themselves an American, NOT move to impeach this one-world government tyrant?

Oh. Half of them are the same.

And if there is still any question, the DHS came out yesterday and said they may refuse to prosecute those found violating the federal law that they are sworn to uphold.

A top Department of Homeland Security official reportedly said his agency will not necessarily process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities.

John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, made the comment during a meeting on Wednesday with the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune, the newspaper reports. (Fox)

Again, no surprise, as the president is sworn to uphold the Constitution that he holds in contempt.

Bye bye, America. You were RACIST, anyway.