Friday, October 30, 2009


(only the invited were allowed to attend what was touted as open. Yeah, I know. New and different.. open=closed, light= dark, etc....same 'ol same 'ol)

Nutsy Pelosi said the bill wll be "deficit neutral."


How stupid does she think we are? Or maybe how un-aware and un-caring? It's an incredible lie to set up an incredible ponzi scheme that will destroy the country.

Rush responds:

when it is exposed as a total fraud, when she and everybody else supporting this are exposed as total liars about all of this being deficit neutral, about all of this covering all these people, about everybody getting all this health care for what they think will be nothing, when all of that is exposed, shouldn’t people like Nancy Pelosi, who lie to get such things passed into legislation, have to face some kind of real consequences? This is nothing more than theft. Are they not thieves? They are stealing billions of dollars from US taxpayers, both taxpayers of today and tomorrow. You can’t even say that they’re enriched by their thievery ’cause they do it to buy votes and more power, and some of them do get enriched as a result of all this.

Why shouldn’t people who steal billions of dollars have to go to jail if the small fry like Bernie Madoff has to go to jail? Madoff is chump change compared to Nancy Pelosi, chump change compared to Barney Frank and Harry Reid. This is generational theft that is going on here. I mean let’s step back. Nancy Pelosi is the most radical Speaker of the House ever, from one of the most radical communities in the nation, San Francisco. She’s pushing this newest proposal now. She’s never cared about costs before, she doesn’t care about them now. She’s never cared about economic reality before because she’s insulated from it. She is wealthy. Her husband is wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. She is George McGovern on hormones, steroids and everything else, and she sees this as the best way for her and her ilk to remain in power for decades.

Folks, both the Senate bill, Dingy Harry’s little bill over there and Pelosi’s bill today are time bombs. They are ticking time bombs. They are designed to destroy private insurance companies and thus the economy. If you look at it from their standpoint these are brilliantly conceived bills and they’re guaranteed to work, they are going to do exactly what these Democrats intend.

Exactly. "Goddamn America:" it's not just for breakfast anymore!

It is SO much easier to control people when they're on their knees! More importantly, it is SO much easier to feel GOOD about your sick, narcissistic need for total control and dominance when you can tell yourself it's benevolence that necessitates keeping the poor, less-intelligent masses down there. Worked for know, the mass murderer that killed because he GENUINELY cared about people, the guy that so many in the Obamunist administration, like Anita Dunn, love and admire. That guy.

Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Obama and their master George Soros are ALL un-American, treasonous snakes. They belong in jail. But instead, they are putting us and generations into the future into the jail of slavery they are building with their dystopian Marxist nightmare.

But people like Rush are "extremists." He believes in The Constitution. He's not mainstream like the man that describes The Constitutionan as "fundamentally flawed" because it does not call for the redistribution of wealth. Obama said about the Supreme Court:

it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

Get that?

It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution

How do we have a man as President that is sworn to uphold a document that he despises? He said what he thinks about it. Now he's acting on his beliefs.

No comments: